<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?rfc toc="yes"?><!DOCTYPE rfc [ <!ENTITY nbsp " "> <!ENTITY zwsp "​"> <!ENTITY nbhy "‑"> <!ENTITY wj "⁠"> ]> <rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" category="std" consensus="true" docName="draft-ietf-dtn-bpv7-admin-iana-04" number="9713" ipr="trust200902" submissionType="IETF" tocInclude="true" symRefs="true" sortRefs="true" updates="9171"version="3">obsoletes="" version="3" xml:lang="en"> <front> <title abbrev="BPv7 AdminIANA"> BundleIANA">Bundle Protocol Version 7 Administrative Record TypesRegistry </title>Registry</title> <seriesInfoname="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-dtn-bpv7-admin-iana-04"/>name="RFC" value="9713"/> <author fullname="Brian Sipos" initials="B." surname="Sipos"> <organization abbrev="JHU/APL">The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory</organization> <address> <postal> <street>11100 Johns Hopkins Rd.</street> <city>Laurel</city> <region>MD</region> <code>20723</code> <country>United States of America</country> </postal> <email>brian.sipos+ietf@gmail.com</email> </address> </author><date/> <area>Transport</area> <workgroup>Delay-Tolerant Networking</workgroup><date year="2025" month="January"/> <area>INT</area> <workgroup>dtn</workgroup> <keyword>DTN</keyword> <abstract> <t> This document updates RFC 9171 to clarify thataBundle Protocol Version 7agent is intendedagents are expected to useanthe IANAregistry for"Bundle Administrative Record Types" registry to identify and document administrative record types.ItThis document alsomakes adesignates codepoint reservationspoints forprivatePrivate andexperimental use.Experimental Use. </t> </abstract> </front> <middle> <section anchor="sec-intro"> <name>Introduction</name> <t>TheAn earlierBundle Protocol (BP) Version 6 (BPv6)specification <xref target="RFC7116"/> defined an IANA registry forAdministrative Recordadministrative record type code pointsunder<xreftarget="IANA-BP"/>.target="IANA-BP"/> for use with the Bundle Protocol (BP) Version 6 (BPv6) <xref target="RFC5050"/>. When Bundle Protocol Version 7 (BPv7) was published in <xreftarget="RFC9171"/>target="RFC9171"/>, it identified the IANA registry forAdministrative Recordadministrative record types but did not update the table to be explicit about which entries applied to which Bundle Protocol version(s). The BPv7 specification also did not discriminate between code point reservations and unassigned ranges forAdministrative Recordadministrative record types. </t> <t> This document updates BPv7 to explicitly use the IANA "Bundle Administrative RecordtypeTypes" registry as described in <xref target="sec-bpv7-admin-type"/>. This document makes a reservation of the zero value for consistency with BPv6. This document also makes a reservation of high-valued code points forprivate usePrivate Use andexperimental useExperimental Use in accordance with <xref target="RFC8126"/> to avoid collisions with assigned code points. </t> <section> <name>Scope</name> <t> This document describes updates to the IANA "Bundle Administrative RecordtypeTypes" registry and how a BPv7 agent is supposed to use that registryfor identifying Administrative Recordto identify administrative record types. </t> <t> This document does not specify how BPv6 and BPv7 can interoperatefor overlappingwhen both use the same code points or how a specific code point is to be interpreted either similarly or differentlybetweenby Bundle Protocol versions.It is up toThe specification for eachindividual Administrative Recordadministrative record typespecificationis to define howitthe administrative record type relates to each BP version. </t> </section> <section anchor="sec-terminology"> <name>Terminology</name> <t> The key words"MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY","<bcp14>MUST</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>NOT RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MAY</bcp14>", and"OPTIONAL""<bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>" in this document are to be interpreted as described inBCP 14BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. </t> </section> </section> <section anchor="sec-bpv7-admin-type"> <name>Administrative Record Types Registry</name> <t> This document updates the requirements in <xref section="6.1" target="RFC9171"/> to specify use of an existing IANA registry and updates that registry as described in <xref target="sec-iana-bp-admin-type"/>. </t> <t> The code point allocated in Annex D of <xref target="CCSDS-BP"/> was never added to the IANA registry. To avoid a collision, this document adds that allocation to the registry. </t> <t> Instead of using the list of types in <xrefsection="6.1" target="RFC9171"/>,target="RFC9171" sectionFormat="of" section="6.1"/>, a BPv7 administrative element <bcp14>SHALL</bcp14>interpretdetermine which administrative record type code values can be used by the "7" noted inaccordance withthe Bundle Protocol Version column of the IANA "Bundle Administrative Record Types" registryunder<xreftarget="IANA-BP"/> for entries having a "Bundle Protocol Version" of 7.target="IANA-BP"/>. </t> <t> If an administrative element receives a not-well-formed application data unit (ADU) or an administrative record type codewhichthat is not able to be processed by the element, the record <bcp14>SHALL</bcp14> be ignored by the element. The processing of a received administrative record ADU does not affect the fact that the bundle itself was delivered to the administrative element or any relatedBPAbundle protocol agent processing of(e.g.(e.g., status reports on) the enveloping bundle. </t> </section> <section anchor="sec-security"> <name>Security Considerations</name> <t> This document does not define any requirements or structureswhichthat introduce new security considerations. </t> <t> The existing security considerations of <xref target="RFC9171"/> still apply when using the IANA "Bundle Administrative RecordTypesTypes" registry. </t> </section> <section anchor="sec-iana"> <name>IANA Considerations</name> <t> This specification modifies a BPv6 registryto extendby extending it for BPv7. </t> <section anchor="sec-iana-bp-admin-type"> <name>Bundle Administrative Record Types</name> <t> Within the "Bundle Protocol" registry group <xref target="IANA-BP"/>, the "Bundle Administrative Record Types" registry has been updated to include a leftmost "Bundle Protocol Version" column. New entries have been added and existing entries have been updated tohaveinclude BP versions as inthe following table.<xref target="tab1"/>. This document makes no changes to the registration procedures for this registry. </t><table><table anchor="tab1"> <name>Bundle Administrative Record Types</name> <thead> <tr> <th>Bundle Protocol Version</th> <th>Value</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Reference</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td>6,7</td> <td>0</td> <td>Reserved</td> <td> <xref target="RFC7116"/>[This specification]RFC 9713 </td> </tr> <tr> <td>6,7</td> <td>1</td> <td>Bundle status report</td> <td> <xref target="RFC5050"/> <xref target="RFC9171"/> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>6</td> <td>2</td> <td>Custody signal</td> <td> <xref target="RFC5050"/> </td> </tr> <tr><td>6,7</td><td></td> <td>3</td> <td>Unassigned</td> <td/> </tr> <tr> <td>6</td> <td>4</td> <td>Aggregate Custody Signal</td> <td> <xref target="CCSDS-BP"/> </td> </tr> <tr><td>6,7</td><td></td> <td>5to- 15</td><td>Unassigned</td> <td/><td colspan="2">Unassigned</td> </tr> <tr> <td>7</td> <td>16to- 64383</td><td>Unassigned</td> <td/><td colspan="2">Unassigned</td> </tr> <tr> <td>7</td> <td>64384to- 64511</td> <td>Reserved forexperimental use</td> <td>[This specification]</td>Experimental Use</td> <td>RFC 9713</td> </tr> <tr> <td>7</td> <td>64512to- 65535</td> <td>Reserved forprivate use</td> <td>[This specification]</td>Private Use</td> <td>RFC 9713</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </section> </section> </middle> <back> <references> <name>References</name> <references> <name>Normative References</name> <reference anchor="IANA-BP" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/bundle/"> <front> <title>Bundle Protocol</title> <author> <organization>IANA</organization> </author> <date/> </front> </reference> <xi:includehref="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml"/>href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml"/> <xi:includehref="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8174.xml"/>href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8174.xml"/> <xi:includehref="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9171.xml"/>href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9171.xml"/> </references> <references> <name>Informative References</name> <reference anchor="CCSDS-BP" target="https://public.ccsds.org/Pubs/734x2b1.pdf"> <front> <title>CCSDS Bundle Protocol Specification</title><seriesInfo name="CCSDS" value="734.2-B-1"/><author> <organization>Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems</organization> </author> <date month="September" year="2015"/> </front> <refcontent>CCSDS Recommended Standard</refcontent> <seriesInfo name="CCSDS" value="734.2-B-1"/> </reference> <xi:includehref="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5050.xml"/>href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5050.xml"/> <xi:includehref="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7116.xml"/>href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7116.xml"/> <xi:includehref="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8126.xml"/>href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8126.xml"/> </references> </references><section anchor="sec-doc-ack" numbered="false"> <name>Acknowledgments</name> <t> </t> </section></back> </rfc>