<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?rfc toc="yes"?>

<!DOCTYPE rfc [
 <!ENTITY nbsp    "&#160;">
 <!ENTITY zwsp   "&#8203;">
 <!ENTITY nbhy   "&#8209;">
 <!ENTITY wj     "&#8288;">
]>

<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" category="std" consensus="true" docName="draft-ietf-dtn-bpv7-admin-iana-04" number="9713" ipr="trust200902" submissionType="IETF" tocInclude="true" symRefs="true" sortRefs="true" updates="9171" version="3"> obsoletes="" version="3" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <title abbrev="BPv7 Admin IANA">
Bundle IANA">Bundle Protocol Version 7 Administrative Record Types Registry
    </title> Registry</title>
    <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-dtn-bpv7-admin-iana-04"/> name="RFC" value="9713"/>
    <author fullname="Brian Sipos" initials="B." surname="Sipos">
      <organization abbrev="JHU/APL">The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
          <street>11100 Johns Hopkins Rd.</street>
          <city>Laurel</city>
          <region>MD</region>
          <code>20723</code>
          <country>United States of America</country>
        </postal>
        <email>brian.sipos+ietf@gmail.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date/>
    <area>Transport</area>
    <workgroup>Delay-Tolerant Networking</workgroup>
    <date year="2025" month="January"/>
    <area>INT</area>
    <workgroup>dtn</workgroup>
    <keyword>DTN</keyword>
    <abstract>
<t>
   This document updates RFC 9171 to clarify that a Bundle Protocol Version 7 agent is intended
   agents are expected to use an the IANA registry for "Bundle Administrative Record Types"
   registry to identify and document administrative record types.
It This
   document also makes a designates code point reservations points for private Private and experimental use. Experimental Use.
</t>

    </abstract>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <section anchor="sec-intro">
      <name>Introduction</name>
      <t>
The
   An earlier Bundle Protocol (BP) Version 6 (BPv6) specification <xref target="RFC7116"/> defined an IANA registry for Administrative Record
   administrative record type code points under <xref target="IANA-BP"/>. target="IANA-BP"/> for use with the
   Bundle Protocol (BP) Version 6 (BPv6) <xref target="RFC5050"/>.
When Bundle Protocol Version 7 (BPv7) was published in <xref target="RFC9171"/> target="RFC9171"/>, it identified the IANA registry for Administrative Record administrative record types but did not update the table to be explicit about which entries applied to which Bundle Protocol version(s).
The BPv7 specification also did not discriminate between code point reservations and unassigned ranges for Administrative Record administrative record types.
      </t>
      <t>
This document updates BPv7 to explicitly use the IANA "Bundle Administrative Record type Types" registry as described in <xref target="sec-bpv7-admin-type"/>.
This document makes a reservation of the zero value for consistency with BPv6.
This document also makes a reservation of high-valued code points for private use Private Use and experimental use Experimental Use in accordance with <xref target="RFC8126"/> to avoid collisions with assigned code points.
      </t>
      <section>
        <name>Scope</name>
        <t>
This document describes updates to the IANA "Bundle Administrative Record type Types" registry and how a BPv7 agent is supposed to use that registry for identifying Administrative Record to identify administrative record types.
        </t>
<t>
   This document does not specify how BPv6 and BPv7 can interoperate for overlapping
   when both use the same code points or how a specific code point is to be
   interpreted either similarly or differently between by Bundle Protocol
   versions.
It is up to  The specification for each individual Administrative Record administrative record type specification is to
   define how it the administrative record type relates to each BP version.
</t>

      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-terminology">
        <name>Terminology</name>
        <t>
    The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", "<bcp14>MUST</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>",
    "<bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL NOT</bcp14>",
    "<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>",
    "<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>NOT RECOMMENDED</bcp14>",
    "<bcp14>MAY</bcp14>", and "OPTIONAL" "<bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>" in this document are to be
    interpreted as described in BCP 14 BCP&nbsp;14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref
    target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as
    shown here.
        </t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec-bpv7-admin-type">
      <name>Administrative Record Types Registry</name>
      <t>
This document updates the requirements in <xref section="6.1" target="RFC9171"/> to specify use of an existing IANA registry and updates that registry as described in <xref target="sec-iana-bp-admin-type"/>.
      </t>
      <t>
The code point allocated in Annex D of <xref target="CCSDS-BP"/> was never added to the IANA registry.
To avoid a collision, this document adds that allocation to the registry.
      </t>
<t>
   Instead of using the list of types in <xref section="6.1" target="RFC9171"/>, target="RFC9171" sectionFormat="of" section="6.1"/>, a
   BPv7 administrative element <bcp14>SHALL</bcp14> interpret determine which administrative
   record type code values can be used by the "7" noted in accordance with the Bundle
   Protocol Version column of the IANA "Bundle Administrative Record Types"
   registry under <xref target="IANA-BP"/> for entries having a "Bundle Protocol Version" of 7. target="IANA-BP"/>.
</t>

      <t>
If an administrative element receives a not-well-formed application data unit (ADU) or an administrative record type code which that is not able to be processed by the element, the record <bcp14>SHALL</bcp14> be ignored by the element.
The processing of a received administrative record ADU does not affect the fact that the bundle itself was delivered to the administrative element or any related BPA bundle
protocol agent processing of (e.g. (e.g., status reports on) the enveloping bundle.
      </t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec-security">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
      <t>
This document does not define any requirements or structures which that introduce new security considerations.
      </t>
      <t>
The existing security considerations of <xref target="RFC9171"/> still apply when using the IANA "Bundle Administrative Record Types Types" registry.
      </t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec-iana">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <t>
This specification modifies a BPv6 registry to extend by extending it for BPv7.
      </t>
      <section anchor="sec-iana-bp-admin-type">
        <name>Bundle Administrative Record Types</name>
        <t>
Within the "Bundle Protocol" registry group <xref target="IANA-BP"/>, the "Bundle Administrative Record Types" registry has been updated to include a leftmost "Bundle Protocol Version" column.
New entries have been added and existing entries have been updated to have include BP versions as in the following table. <xref target="tab1"/>.
This document makes no changes to the registration procedures for this registry.
        </t>
        <table>
        <table anchor="tab1">
          <name>Bundle Administrative Record Types</name>
          <thead>
            <tr>
              <th>Bundle Protocol Version</th>
              <th>Value</th>
              <th>Description</th>
              <th>Reference</th>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>6,7</td>
              <td>0</td>
              <td>Reserved</td>
              <td>
                <xref target="RFC7116"/>
                [This specification]
                RFC 9713
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>6,7</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td>Bundle status report</td>
              <td>
                <xref target="RFC5050"/>
                <xref target="RFC9171"/>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>6</td>
              <td>2</td>
              <td>Custody signal</td>
              <td>
                <xref target="RFC5050"/>
              </td>
            </tr>

            <tr>
              <td>6,7</td>
              <td></td>
              <td>3</td>
              <td>Unassigned</td>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>6</td>
              <td>4</td>
              <td>Aggregate Custody Signal</td>
              <td>
                <xref target="CCSDS-BP"/>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>6,7</td>
              <td></td>
              <td>5 to - 15</td>
              <td>Unassigned</td>
              <td/>
              <td colspan="2">Unassigned</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>7</td>
              <td>16 to - 64383</td>
              <td>Unassigned</td>
              <td/>
              <td colspan="2">Unassigned</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>7</td>
              <td>64384 to - 64511</td>
              <td>Reserved for experimental use</td>
              <td>[This specification]</td> Experimental Use</td>
              <td>RFC 9713</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>7</td>
              <td>64512 to - 65535</td>
              <td>Reserved for private use</td>
              <td>[This specification]</td> Private Use</td>
              <td>RFC 9713</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </section>
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>
    <references>
      <name>References</name>
      <references>
        <name>Normative References</name>

        <reference anchor="IANA-BP" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/bundle/">
          <front>
            <title>Bundle Protocol</title>
            <author>
              <organization>IANA</organization>
            </author>
            <date/>
          </front>
        </reference>

        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml"/> href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8174.xml"/> href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8174.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9171.xml"/> href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9171.xml"/>

      </references>

      <references>
        <name>Informative References</name>

        <reference anchor="CCSDS-BP" target="https://public.ccsds.org/Pubs/734x2b1.pdf">
          <front>
            <title>CCSDS Bundle Protocol Specification</title>
            <seriesInfo name="CCSDS" value="734.2-B-1"/>
            <author>
              <organization>Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems</organization>
            </author>
            <date month="September" year="2015"/>
          </front>
	  <refcontent>CCSDS Recommended Standard</refcontent>
          <seriesInfo name="CCSDS" value="734.2-B-1"/>
        </reference>

        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5050.xml"/> href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5050.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7116.xml"/> href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7116.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8126.xml"/> href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8126.xml"/>
      </references>
    </references>
    <section anchor="sec-doc-ack" numbered="false">
      <name>Acknowledgments</name>
      <t>
      </t>
    </section>

  </back>
</rfc>